 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Richards v. Rheem Mfg. Co., No. CA 99-1073,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, April 5, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The Workers' Compensation Commission determination that employee's injuries were neither a result of a recurrence of an earlier compensable injury, nor a fall while at work, was supported by substantial evidence.
|
|||||
| Sargent v. City of West Fork, No. CA99-601,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, April 5, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the language of the deed was unambiguous, and where there was no reservation within the four-corners of the deed, there was no error in holding that title in fee simple was granted.
|
|||||
| Snowden v. Riggins, CA 99-1032,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, April 5, 2000, Opinion delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where lawyer's withdrawal from personal representative appointment hearing prejudiced appellants by not providing proper notice, the decision in that hearing was improper and motion to set aside should have been granted.
|
|||||
| Swafford v. Swafford, No. CA 99-942,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, April 5, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellee's relocation would increase her income and she would be able to spend more time with child. Thus, decision permitting appellee to relocate with child was not clearly against the preponderance of the evidence.
|
|||||
| Walls v. Wal-Mart Stores, No. CA 99-883,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, April 5, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Employee was properly denied temporary total disability where the medical evidence and employee's own testimony showed that he could have performed light work and employer did not prevent him from going so.
|
|||||
| Wellman v. Wellman, No. CA 99-768,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, April 5, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The property division was not clearly erroneous, and the alimony award was not an abuse of discretion where appellant failed to produce evidence and was unbelievable.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
