 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Ark. Aluminum Alloys v. Taylor, CA00-1145,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, April 25, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Decision that employee was entitled to additional medical treatment for pain causally related to a work-related injury, including a referral to a pain specialist to determine if further treatment would help, was supported by substantial evidence.
|
|||||
| Barnes v. Morrow, CA 00-1089,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, April 25, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Chancery court's refusal to award mother additional arrearages for time that her son was not in her custody was proper where son moved in with sister and father provided support to sister in lieu of child-support payments to mother.
|
|||||
| Beasley v. State, CACR 00-888,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, April 25, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Robbery conviction upheld where evidence showed appellant committed theft and chose to employ acts of force to avoid arrest. Trial court did not err in denying directed verdict as issue of immediate physical force was fact question.
|
|||||
| Bohanon v. State, CACR00-804,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, April 25, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Convictions for theft, kidnapping, and aggravated robbery upheld, as appeal was meritless. Offenses did not constitute one criminal episodes, thus sentences within the statutory range on each count were not excessive.
|
|||||
| Bonham v. State, CA CR 00-1115,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, April 25, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court was not deprived of jurisdiction for sentencing purposes for revoking appellant's probation and then extending it as extension of probation was not an execution of sentence causing loss of jurisdiction under Arkansas statutory law.
|
|||||
| Brewer v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs., CA 00-98,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISIONS FOUR AND ONE, April 25, 2001, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Dependency-neglect finding and refusal of reunification services as to first child of parents, who was severely injured over a period of time, was sufficient to support same ruling as to second child who was removed immediately after birth.
|
|||||
| Brown v. Kawneer Co., CA 00-01073,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, April 25, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A positive drug test did not establish a direct causal link between the use of the drug and a worker's injury where a machine malfunctioned at work in a workers' compensation proceeding.
|
|||||
| Brown v. Ruallam Enters., CA 00-934,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, April 25, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Chancellor erred by calculating damages for unauthorized use of trade secrets and matter remanded for proper calculation on the basis of net profit, whether lost by the injured party or gained by the wrongdoer.
|
|||||
| Bukowczyk v. State, CA CR 00-982,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, April 25, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The essential question raised by appellant was whether the giving of a postdated check, bearing the notation, "hold in lieu of loan check," constituted a violation of the Arkansas Hot Check Law. The appellate court held it did not.
|
|||||
| Campbell v. UPS, Inc., CA00-1017,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, April 25, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: While employee's physical activity level after a compensable injury did not prevent him from earning wages, denial of temporary total disability benefits based on his physical activity level was not supported by substantial evidence.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
