 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Ray v. Little John Trucks Inc., No. CA99-1069,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, April 12, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Employee was not entitled to an increase in permanent impairment rating where medical evidence did not support an increase and the employee's injuries could not be assessed.
|
|||||
| Smith v. Arkansas Bd. of Private Investigators & Private Sec. Agencies, No. CA99-1010,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, April 12, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Decision that defendant violated state statute concerning conduct of private investigators was supported by substantial evidence, as evidence showed defendant misled client as to defendant's experience and other violations.
|
|||||
| Smith v. Russ, CA 99-801,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, April 12, 2000, Opinion delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: No error in finding that appellants breached the parties' contract for sale because appellee did not receive title, nor return of his consideration; error in awarding appellee lost tips and wages.
|
|||||
| Tilton v. State, No. CACR 99-1272,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, April 12, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence was sufficient to support defendant's conviction for possession with intent to deliver methamphetamine, and he failed to preserve his challenge to the proof of his habitual-offender status.
|
|||||
| Whisenhunt v. Bee Branch Water Ass'n Inc., No. CA 99-165,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, April 12, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In dispute over whether water lines could be placed under roadway, roadway had been dedicated to the public, thus giving association the right to lay water lines; roadway could not have been considered a rural highway.
|
|||||
| Willis v. State, No. CACR 99-1130,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, April 12, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: There was sufficient evidence to support the drug-related convictions, and trial court did not err in admitting into evidence certain items found pursuant to a valid search warrant.
|
|||||
| Wood v. West Tree Serv., CA 99-708,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISIONS ONE AND FOUR, April 12, 2000, Opinion delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of dependency benefits affirmed where substantial evidence was presented through toxicology reports and doctor's testimony to support decision; Commission's function to determine credibility and weight of testimony.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
