 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Pinder v. State, CR 02-1289,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 8, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Sparkman v. State, CR 04-268,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 8, 2004, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In defendant's rape case, the lodging of the partial record and the issuance of a writ of certiorari directing the court reporter to complete and file the transcript within 30 days of the date of the order were authorized.
|
|||||
| State v. Hagan-Sherwin, CR 03-249,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 8, 2004, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In an insurance fraud case, the State's appeal was improper where its argument raised the issue of application, and not interpretation, of a statute, therefore, the appeal did not involve the correct and uniform administration of the criminal law.
|
|||||
| Weaver v. State, CR 02-737,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 8, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Weigel v. Farmers Ins. Co., 03-643,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 8, 2004, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In appeal of disqualification of litigant's attorney in case against insurance company, judgment was affirmed; rule prohibited attorney from being an advocate where he was likely to be a necessary witness.
|
|||||
| Wright v. State, CR 03-121,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 8, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court properly dismissed defendant's petition for writ of habeas corpus where alleged new scientific evidence did not establish his actual innocence and the scientific predicate for the claim could have been previously discovered.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
