 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| State v. Fudge, CR 04-83,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 14, 2005, Opinion delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although counsel's assistance in failing to object to a battery conviction as an aggravating circumstance in a capital murder case was not ineffective, the State failed to raise this argument on appeal; a new sentencing hearing was required.
|
|||||
| Tilmon v. State, No. CR 03-1443,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 14, 2005, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's counsel was not ineffective for moving to withdraw her guilty plea after conviction was entered on docket because there was no entry of judgment; because judgment and commitment order had not been filed, motion to withdraw plea was proper under Ark. R. Crim. P. 26.1(b); defendant's petition for postconviction relief was properly denied.
|
|||||
| Wilson v. State, No. CR 03-1316,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 14, 2005, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Forensic chemist testified that (1) evidence seized from inmate's residence was commonly used to manufacture methamphetamine (meth); (2) residue on items seized from residence was meth; and (3) absence of ammonia from evidence seized did not prove that he did not manufacture meth. Thus, there was ample evidence to convict him of manufacturing meth.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
