 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Pierce v. Pierce, CA 00-1231,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, April 25, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court's denial of a father's petition for change of custody was reversed where there was no satisfactory explanation in the trial court's record of how the child had received cigarette burns on his arm.
|
|||||
| Rupe v. State, CACR00-963,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, April 25, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Substantial evidence showed appellant ran over man attempting to repossess appellant's truck, and that appellant drove away in it yelling profanities; thus evidence supported appellant's first-degree battery conviction.
|
|||||
| Shackleford v. Dollar Gen. Store, CA 00-1040,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, April 25, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Employee properly denied benefits for slip and fall. Mere fact that she was in the parking lot of her employer's premises when the injury occurred was insufficient to establish entitlement to compensation.
|
|||||
| Slusher v. Slusher, CA 00-933,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISIONS ONE AND TWO, April 25, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court could not amend divorce decree to set aside alleged father's visitation and support obligation even after receiving evidence alleged father was not actually father.
|
|||||
| Smith v. County Market/Southeast Foods, CA 00-0656,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISIONS ONE AND TWO, April 25, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of benefits reversed and remanded because "discogram" showing bodily abnormalities included statutory objective findings despite having a pain-response component. Muscle spasm was also objective finding.
|
|||||
| Stidham v. State, CACR00-531,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, April 25, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred by denying motion for mistrial after reading various severed offenses to the jury during voir dire as it denied appellant due process of law by violating his right to a fair and impartial jury.
|
|||||
| Thomas v. Domicile Prop. Mgmt., Inc., CA00-749,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, April 25, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Claim of an apartment tenant for damages for failure to provide habitable dwelling denied. The tenant failed to develop the legal issues raised on appeal or explain how cited regulations applied to his case.
|
|||||
| Va. Ins. Reciprocal v. Vogel, CA 00-781,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, April 25, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The newly discovered evidence showed subsequent door malfunctions were foreseeable in light of prior incidents. That foreseeability was a serious weakness in appellee's case, and would likely lead to a different result were the case retried.
|
|||||
| Vector Techs., LTD. v. Ashlock Roofing, Inc., CA00-916,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, April 25, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err in finding foreign default judgment was not entitled to full faith and credit and that the foreign court did not have jurisdiction over corporation as corporation's contacts were insufficient.
|
|||||
| White Consol. Indus., Inc. v. Thompson, CA00-945,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, April 25, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Verdict for man who was injured while using a gas-powered lawn trimmer was affirmed where his expert was allowed to testify as to theory he developed night before trial and $ 166,803 award was not excessive given man's inability to work and pain.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
