 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Barnett v. State, CA99-1256,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, July 5, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Motion to withdraw representation of defendant after filing no-merit appellate brief denied and rebriefing ordered where court's review of record indicated issue as to the legality of defendant's sentence remained unaddressed.
|
|||||
| Brady v. State, CACR 99-992,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, July 5, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Counsel's motion to withdraw representation citing meritless issues on appeal denied and rebriefing ordered where counsel failed to brief adverse ruling on appellant's motion for directed verdict on the charges.
|
|||||
| Collier v. State, CACR 98-1301,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, July 5, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Substantial evidence supported convictions for first-degree battery and being a felon in possession of a firearm because it showed the victim suffered physical pain from being shot, and appellant admitted being a felon and firing at the victim.
|
|||||
| Deininger v. Baldwin, CA99-1333,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, July 5, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Award of attorney's fee affirmed, but denial of prejudgment interest reversed and remanded for determination of amount; determination of the amount of prejudgment interest was possible without reliance on opinion or discretion.
|
|||||
| Estate of McKasson v. Hamric, CA 99-940,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, July 5, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Witnesses testified that deceased was mentally alert and understood what she was doing; thus, deceased did not lack mental capacity when she disposed of real estate and added appellee wife to her accounts and certificate of deposits.
|
|||||
| McChristian v. State, CA CR 99-1302,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, July 5, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Differences between officer's and lab report's description of the substance were not so different as to support allegations of tampering. State sufficiently established the chain of custody. Appellant's conviction was affirmed.
|
|||||
| McKinney v. Gude, CA 99-102,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, July 5, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: City council did not overstep its bounds when it revoked club owner's occupation license. He was not immunized from valid city ordinances simply because he sold alcohol; thus, revocation of his occupation license was affirmed.
|
|||||
| Office of Child Support Enforcement v. Calbert, CA 99-1174,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISIONS TWO AND THREE, July 5, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Order terminating father's child support obligation was affirmed because the evidence showed the child spent only twenty-five percent of his time in his mother's home.
|
|||||
| Potter v. State, CA CR 99-1248,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISIONS FOUR AND ONE, July 5, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Arresting officer lacked reasonable suspicion of criminal activity enumerated in procedural rules to stop and detain appellant; therefore, trial court's failure to grant motion to suppress illegal drugs was improper.
|
|||||
| Reeves v. State, CACR99-1486,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, July 5, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because of vehicle's make, model, and good condition, and fact that owner testified that she purchased it only two years before theft, evidence established that its value was at least $ 2,500, and theft by receiving conviction affirmed.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
