 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Nelson v. State, CA CR 01-840,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISIONS THREE AND FOUR, April 17, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's right to a speedy trial was violated, where charge lodged in another county involving the same offense, but including additional charges started the one-year time frame in which to bring him to trial.
|
|||||
| Peevy v. Dir., E01-149,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, April 17, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where employee presented no evidence that her work assignments were disproportionate or unfair, or evidence of how her health was affected, finding that employee was disqualified from unemployment benefits was supported by substantial evidence.
|
|||||
| Taylor v. State, CA CR 01-748,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, April 17, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where evidence showed that defendant fired gun and three bullets hit victim, jury was able to infer that defendant intended the natural and probable consequence of his actions, which was that he shot the victim.
|
|||||
| Volvo Commer. Fin. v. Lard, CA01-1184,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, April 17, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Admissions of mechanics at trial and consideration by trial court of security agreements were sufficient proof before trial court that financier had an interest in abandoned vehicles, and thus it was an error to grant mechanics a directed verdict.
|
|||||
| Walters v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs., CA 01-1094,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, April 17, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court had jurisdiction to terminate mother's parental rights where following probable cause hearing, the trial court retained continuing jurisdiction over matter, and evidence was sufficient to support termination.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
