LexisNexis
  
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Arkansas - April 16, 2003

  
Rogers v. State, CACR 02-458, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, April 16, 2003, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: As to search warrant, informant's reliability and veracity were not required to be established, as he was not a confidential informant. Rebuttal testimony by employee was properly allowed to rebut defendants' lack of knowledge of methamphetamine.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Saulsberry v. State, CA CR 02-725, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, April 16, 2003, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: Although searching officer testified that defendant did not present danger, it was possible defendant could have broken away from detaining officer and had access to any weapons in vehicle. Thus, search of truck's cab was not unreasonable.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Stroud v. Cagle, CA 02-1215, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, April 16, 2003, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Wilkerson v. Scroggins, CA02-741, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, April 16, 2003, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: There was no error in finding that the biological father had justifiable cause in not paying court ordered support consistently where he had no steady employment due to an accident and the mother prevented father's communication with the child.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

 www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us
  Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.