 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Adams v. Wolf, CA 00-700,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISIONS ONE, THREE AND FOUR, May 2, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment was improper in fraud action as issues of fact remained about whether subsidiary fraudulently concealed improper turkey weighing procedures and whether turkey growers exercised due diligence in discovering the alleged fraud.
|
|||||
| Beckham v. State, CACR00-901,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, May 2, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of motion to suppress drug found in appellant's purse after arrest for fleeing and possession of stolen property was upheld. Plain sight of stolen gun in purse gave probable cause for arrest although she was not guilty of theft or flight.
|
|||||
| Bishop v. Bishop, CA00-843,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, May 2, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Order holding ex-husband in contempt was affirmed, as court's finding that he had the ability to pay sums owed to ex-wife under property settlement agreement, but willfully refused to do so, was not clearly against preponderance of the evidence.
|
|||||
| Bryant v. Pettingill, CA 00-738,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, May 2, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Buckley v. Buckley, CA 00-1368,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, May 2, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court had not terminated appellant father's visitation rights; he had never pursued any. The chancellor simply declined to award any visitation rights. Circumstances warranted the denial of his visitation rights.
|
|||||
| Buddy York Bail Bonds, Inc. v. Walker, CA 00-1085,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, May 2, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Anti-competition covenant in bail bond company's employment contract was not enforceable since employee used no special training, trade secrets, confidential business information, or customer lists to gain unfair competitive advantage.
|
|||||
| Caffey v. State, CACR00-628,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, May 2, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Recently stolen property's unexplained possession created presumption defendant knew property was stolen and proved theft receiving; flight avoiding arrest corroborated defendant's guilt; retrieval of evidence defendant abandoned was not seizure.
|
|||||
| Campbell v. State, CACR00-999,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, May 2, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly allowed prosecution to ask hostile witness leading questions; radio dispatcher's statement was admissible with limiting instruction; pro se defendant was required to contemporaneously object at trial to preserve issue for review.
|
|||||
| Cragar v. State, CACR00-1138,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, May 2, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Sufficient evidence supported the jury's finding that methamphetamine found in appellant's wallet during the booking process belonged to appellant. The jury was entitled to choose to believe the State's account of the facts rather than appellant's.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
