 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Brady v. State, CR 00-929,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 18, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where counsel's no-merit brief did not comply with supreme court rules because it did not contain discussion as to why particular rulings were not meritorious grounds for reversal, counsel was ordered to rebrief the case.
|
|||||
| Doe v. Baum, 01-1159,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 18, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where girl was raped by boy on school bus, and girl's family sued bus driver, school district, school board and department of education, and family lost, trial court did not err by ruling that statute was repealed by implication.
|
|||||
| Edwards v. State, CR 01-1396,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 18, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant proceeded pro se, acceptance of fault for failure to follow procedural rules did not excuse defendant's failure to act and claim of timely notice of appeal without proof was rejected.
|
|||||
| Gooden v. State, CR 00-845,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 18, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Hall v. State, CR 01-917,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 18, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant demonstrated an inability to comply with the 30-day period to respond to counsel's motion to be relieved due to a lack of research time because of incarceration, court granted extension of time to defendant to respond.
|
|||||
| Hunt v. State, CR 01-1257,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 18, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Lamere v. State, CR 02-155,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 18, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's motion to consolidate the postconviction record and trial record was moot because trial transcript and postconviction appeal stemmed from same judgment and were already part of the same public record.
|
|||||
| Looney v. State, CR 01-1308,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 18, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| McCoy v. State, No. CR 01-762,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 18, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
