LexisNexis
  
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Arkansas - April 15, 2004

  
Blackwell v. State, CR 98-456, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 15, 2004, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: A dentist's request to reinvest a trial court with jurisdiction to consider his petition for a writ of error coram nobis was denied where he failed to assert any ground on which such a writ could have been issued.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Franklin v. Maggio, 04-330, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 15, 2004, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Gonzales v. City of Dewitt, 03-936, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 15, 2004, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: Although participation by the city in a police officer retirement plan was discretionary, the trial court should have determined whether the adoption of another plan was similar in purpose to the statute to determine if there was a violation.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Hogrobrooks v. Bd. of Law Exam'rs, 03-1414, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 15, 2004, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
In re Ark. Access to Justice Comm., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL], SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 15, 2004, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
In re Ret. of Watkins, [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL], SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 15, 2004, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
In re Supreme Court Comm. on Civ. Practice, [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL], SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 15, 2004, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Juarez-Reyes v. State, CR 03-1339, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 15, 2004, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Where defendant's petition to withdraw his guilty plea was untimely, and such timeliness requirement was jurisdictional, his appeal from the trial court's denial of his petition was dismissed, as defendant could not have prevailed on appeal.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Mack v. Brazil, Adlong & Winningham, PLC, 03-900, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 15, 2004, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: The trial court did not err in finding that the law firm substantially complied with the attorney's lien statute, where the adverse parties had actual notice of the asserted lien; the law firm was entitled to money from the client's settlement.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Manila Sch. Dist. No. 15 v. Wagner, 03-755, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 15, 2004, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: The issues pertaining to the taxpayers' standing to seek an injunction and the irreparable harm upon which the injunction relied were moot, as the injunction had been dissolved; school district's motion to remove trial judge was not cognizable.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

 www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us
  Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.