LexisNexis
  
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Arkansas - April 17, 2003

  
Johnson v. Union Pac. R.R., 02-602, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 17, 2003, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: A trial court lacked jurisdiction to determine whether or not an employee's claim against an employer was covered by the provisions of the Arkansas Workers' Compensation Act because it was unclear which employer the employee was working for.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Nazaretta v. State, CR 03-27, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 17, 2003, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: The granting of the inmates' motions asking to be permitted to proceed with an appeal never perfected by their attorney was proper where the attorney was not relieved by the court and could therefore not abandon the inmates' appeal.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Sanders v. State, CR 02-1116, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 17, 2003, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Smart v. State, CR 02-1013, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 17, 2003, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant's confession to murder was properly admitted into evidence because it was not involuntary; the evidence showed that defendant came to the police station voluntarily, was read his rights, and was given food during questioning.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

 www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us
  Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.