LexisNexis
  
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Arkansas - April 20, 2000

  
Abraham v. Norris, No. CR 98-1266, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 20, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: The court would not address the appellant's challenge because his brief and abstract were missing any material parts of the pleadings, any proceedings, facts, documents, or other matters in the record.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Bell v. Green, No. 99-840, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 20, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Burke v. Elmore, 99-1376, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 20, 2000, Opinion delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: Court concluded that ordinance of defendant city authorizing defendant mayor to conduct certain relevant purchases was unauthorized by the express terms of the relevant statute, and was thus illegal.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Casey v. State, CR 00-388, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 20, 2000, Opinion delivered
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Cunningham v. State, 00-202, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 20, 2000, Opinion delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: Under the Interstate Agreement on Detainers (IAD), once a prisoner was released on parole, he or she was no longer in the class of prisoners covered by the IAD.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Dirickson v. State, CR 99-795, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 20, 2000, Opinion delivered
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Epps v. State, No. CR 97-1490, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 20, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: The totality of the circumstances supported no error finding in not suppressing custodial statements. Testimony established that appellant gave two statements to police subsequent to invoking his right to counsel.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co. v. Foote, 99-1365, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 20, 2000, Opinion delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: Judgment for insureds in claim for insurance proceeds arising from fire was affirmed because substantial evidence showed that they had insurable interest in property. Daubert test for scientific expert testimony was adopted.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Hawthone v. Purifoy, No. CR 00-360, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 20, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Kail v. State, CR 99-667, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 20, 2000, Opinion delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: Murder defendant failed to show he suffered prejudice by exclusion of evidence regarding circumstances arising to level of extreme emotional disturbance because evidence would not have supported manslaughter instruction.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

 www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us
  Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.