 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Andrews v. State, CR 99-689,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 3, 2001, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence was sufficient to convict even without accomplice testimony. Defendant failed to show prejudice or that outcome of trial would have been different because of counsel's actions.
|
|||||
| Arnold v. State, CR 01-277,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 3, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because proper disposition of the motion for belated appeal required findings to be made in the trial court, the matter was remanded for an evidentiary hearing on whether counsel was informed that appellant desired to appeal.
|
|||||
| Barfield v. State, CACR 99-233,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 3, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Petitioner failed to show the transcript should be provided to him at no cost. An incarcerated person desiring a photocopy of a transcript could request that a copy be mailed to the prison, but had to bear the photocopying cost.
|
|||||
| Ensey v. Norris, 99-752,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 3, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The transfer board's action was within its duties and power, and did not afford declaratory relief or writ of mandamus. Appellant possessed no right to transfer; he failed to complete the conditions established to rectify concerns.
|
|||||
| Hatfield v. State, CR 01-285,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 3, 2001, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Huddleston v. State, CR 00-697,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 3, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Cashion, [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 3, 2001, Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| McGehee v. State, CR 00-760,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 3, 2001, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of appellant's application for postconviction relief was reversed and remanded because the trial court failed to make required written statement of facts and conclusions of law in appellant's death penalty case.
|
|||||
| Munson v. State, CR 99-824,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 3, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant failed to show counsel's performance was deficient for not calling witnesses or how their testimony would have changed the outcome. Absent prejudice, the appellate court affirmed denial of postconviction relief.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
