 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Barnes v. Barnes, CA01-1162,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, April 24, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where there was no evidence presented to suggest that the needs of the children supported a finding that child support be ordered retroactively, trial court did not abuse its discretion by not ordering retroactive child support.
|
|||||
| Burnett v. Phila. Life Ins. Co., CA01-991,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, April 24, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where only insurer was granted summary judgment, and claim was still pending against insurance agent, summary judgment order was not final, and appellate court lacked jurisdiction to hear beneficiary's appeal.
|
|||||
| Clarendon Nat'l Ins. Co. v. Roberts, CA01-1075,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, April 24, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where trial court retained jurisdiction over awarding of fees, costs, interest, and statutory penalties after entry of summary judgment against insurer, appellate court was without jurisdiction to review insurer's appeal.
|
|||||
| Clayton Kidd Logging Co. v. McGee, CA 01-1256,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, April 24, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where evidence showed that employee had compensable injury, and employer refused to return him to work and terminated him without reasonable cause, defendant was entitled to additional workers' compensation benefits for termination.
|
|||||
| Crockett v. State, CACR 01-1018,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, April 24, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant elected to represent herself in trial on speeding charge, defendant could not claim on appeal that the quality of her own defense amounted to a denial of effective assistance of counsel.
|
|||||
| Dunsworth v. State, CACR01-968,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, April 24, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Search of defendant's vehicle was incident to defendant's lawful arrest, as once officers arrested defendant, they were authorized to search his person as well as his vehicle and seize evidence of any crime.
|
|||||
| Eiland v. State, CACR01-1245,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, April 24, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Officers' observations, defendant's failure to pass three field sobriety tests, and her refusal to submit to blood alcohol content testing constituted substantial evidence to support her DWI conviction.
|
|||||
| Hart v. State, CA CR 01-838,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, April 24, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant admitted at trial that he was intoxicated when he assaulted police officer, wife's testimony about defendant's drinking and typical behavior when intoxicated was relevant and not highly prejudicial.
|
|||||
| Jag Consulting v. Eubanks, CA 01-1183,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, April 24, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where man was charged with taking company's tools and equipment, but charges were dropped, and man successfully sued company for conversion, it was error to deny the company's motion for directed verdict, and case was reversed and remanded.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
