 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Jones v. State, CACR00-1274,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, April 24, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where no reversible error was apparent from a review of the record, the defendant's appeal was without merit and counsel's motion to be relieved was granted.
|
|||||
| Little v. Little, CA 01-1027,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, April 24, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where trial court's alimony award to wife was in excess of her estimates for living expenses, and husband provided health insurance to wife, appellate court affirmed alimony award, but modified the amount awarded.
|
|||||
| McAdams v. Faulk, CA01-1350,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, April 24, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a liberal construction of pet owner's pro se complaint advised veterinarian that he had a fiduciary obligation regarding care of pet and complaint alleged an employee choked the pet, it was error for the trial court to dismiss the complaint.
|
|||||
| Norton v. Pulaski County Indus. Dev. Comm'n, CA01-658,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, April 24, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Publishing of warning notice to driver in default on promissory note was reasonably calculated to give driver actual notice of the proceedings, and thus the method of service met the constitutional requirements of due process.
|
|||||
| Oliver v. State, CA CR 01-988,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, April 24, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant alleged that he was threatened with physical violence during interrogation, trial court erred in not requiring detective who observed interrogation and was in a position to observe the alleged coercion to be called as a witness.
|
|||||
| Rogers Tool Works v. Black, CA01-1107,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, April 24, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Employee's skin condition was serious enough to require him to terminate his employment. There was sufficient medical evidence of existence and extent of skin condition and that employee could no longer work in his prior employment.
|
|||||
| Runke v. State, CACR 01-854,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, April 24, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant failed to challenge sufficiency of evidence in regard to lesser-included offenses of third degree battery and negligent homicide in either motion for directed verdict, the issue was not preserved for appeal.
|
|||||
| Schueller v. Schueller, CA 01-1118,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, April 24, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In delinquent child support proceeding, father was not entitled to a jury trial where father cited no authority the contempt citation would have required a trial by jury at common law or that incarceration beyond six months was contemplated.
|
|||||
| Trubey v. Gray, CA01-1214,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, April 24, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where jury awarded injured person only $ 1,100 over her medical expenses and property damage of $ 23,863, the trial court properly granted a new trial finding that the recovery that was too small in light of the evidence of permanent injuries.
|
|||||
| Tucker v. State, CACR01-946,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, April 24, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant admitted to drinking and using drugs prior to accident and that his drinking may have played a role in the accident, trial court's admission of testimony pertaining to the urine test was harmless error.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
