 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Moore v. Moore, CA 03-152,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, April 21, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a son brought a suit against his parents, claiming that they had converted his funds to their own use, trial court did not err in making the dispositive finding that there was no credible evidence that the mother was guilty of any impropriety.
|
|||||
| NPC Int'l, Inc. v. Hill, CA03-890,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, April 21, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court's decision to grant a default judgment and to strike the answer was affirmed, because the restaurant had not shown that there were any excusable reasons when the restaurant filed its answer one day after the extended deadline.
|
|||||
| Payne v. State, CA CR 03-912,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, April 21, 2004, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a robbery case, testimony by store employees that they ran after and tackled defendant after seeing him take an item without paying for it implied some type of physical force was used against them and was sufficient to show use of force.
|
|||||
| Peppers v. State, CACR02-1100,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, April 21, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: State presented race-neutral explanations for strikes of two prospective African-American jurors, where they were either acquainted with defendant or knew witnesses in case, and where family members had been prosecuted by one of State's attorneys.
|
|||||
| Perkins v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs., CA03-908,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, April 21, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The juvenile court properly terminated a mother's parental rights upon a finding that her children were staying with their grandfather who abused them and kept them in filthy clothes. Their father was already incarcerated for child abuse.
|
|||||
| Reap v. Automation Sys., CA03-229,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, April 21, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of additional temporary total disability benefits was proper, where substantial evidence showed employee had reached end of healing period in relation to disc herniation, but substantial evidence also supported additional medical treatment.
|
|||||
| Roddy v. State, CACR03-802,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, April 21, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The circuit court properly revoked defendant's probation; defendant did not contest the fact that he failed to report to his probation officer, did not attend drug rehabilitation, tested positive for controlled substances, and was convicted for DWI.
|
|||||
| Sikes v. Georgia-Pacific Corp., CA03-1114,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, April 21, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In an employee's occupation disease case, denial of workers' compensation benefits was proper as he failed to sufficiently show that he came into contact with certain mold at work and that his respiratory problem was related to workplace exposure.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
