Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
   State Courts - Arkansas - April 28, 2005
  
Nance v. State, No. CR 99-365, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 28, 2005, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: Although petitioner claimed that the State was prohibited from imposing the death penalty under Ark. Code Ann. ? 5-4-618(b) (Repl. 1997) because of his mental retardation, his petition for writ of error coram nobis was denied; petitioner failed to exercise due diligence in raising his claims.

Search Cases for Free
  
Shaw v. State, No. CR 05-236, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 28, 2005, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free
  
Smith v. State, CR 05-27, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 28, 2005, Opinion delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: In postconviction proceedings, the Supreme Court of Arkansas granted appellant's motion to remand the case to the trial court to settle the record. The file-stamp date on the petition for postconviction relief was incorrect. The court could not determine whether the petition was timely filed under Ark. R. Crim. P. 37.2(c).

Search Cases for Free
  
Tobacco Superstore, Inc. v. Darrough, 04-1329, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 28, 2005, Opinion delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: In an employment discrimination case, a trial court erred by failing to grant a motion for admission pro hac vice under Ark. R. Admis. Bar. XIV because all of the requirements were met either by motion or at a hearing; the attorneys were not required to submit a certified copy of a Tennessee rule regarding comity.

Search Cases for Free
  
Wilburn v. Cottrell, No. CR 05-380, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 28, 2005, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free
  
Williams v. Ark. Dep't of Corr., 03-674, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 28, 2005, Opinion delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: Inmate who asserted wool blankets caused him to suffer rashes, did not show a serious medical need that would have supported a claim of a violation of Ark. Const. Art. 2, ? 9 or Arkansas Civil Rights Act, Ark. Code Ann. ? 16-123-105 (Supp. 2003). He was provided with treatment for symptoms, but same did not rise to level of serious medical need.

Search Cases for Free
  
Young v. State, No. CR 04-1321, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 28, 2005, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: Where appellant inmate did not file his petition for postconviction relief seeking pretrial sentencing credit within the ninety-day time limit set out in Ark. R. Crim. P. 37.2, the circuit court did not have jurisdiction to grant him relief. The circuit court did not err when it declined to grant the motion to modify his sentence.

Search Cases for Free
  
Back to Top
  


Copyright© 2011 LexisNexis®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.