 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Moses v. Hanna's Candle Co., No. 05-1105,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 4, 2006, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Grant of summary judgment in favor of a company and its owner in an individual's product liability action against the company for injuries she sustained while working on a production line for the company was reversed as the Arkansas Workers' Compensation Commission had exclusive jurisdiction under Ark. Code Ann. § 11-9-105 to resolve the matter.
|
|||||
| Oliver v. State, No. CR 05-812,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 4, 2006, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of inmate's petition to vacate and set aside judgment on robbery, burglary, kidnapping and theft charges that requested testing pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. § 16-112-202(c)(1) was affirmed as inmate did not establish that if the source of fingerprints had been identified, the identification would significantly advance his claim of innocence.
|
|||||
| Pennington v. State, No. CR 06-213,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 4, 2006, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court denied petitioner's motion for reconsideration of denial of his motion to proceed with belated appeal of order denying his pleading entitled "New Rule of Law for Mandamus Motion to Withdraw Guilty Plea" where he failed to show that notice of appeal was either timely filed or received within 30-day period required by Ark. R. App. P. Civ. 4(a).
|
|||||
| Weston v. State, No. CR05-972,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 4, 2006, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: There was substantial evidence showing that defendant made a premeditated and deliberate choice to shoot and kill victim where there was testimony that defendant had possession of weapon that was used to kill victim, that defendant had a motive to kill him, and that shots at victim were intentional and not random shots into the building.
|
|||||
| White v. State, No. CR 06-413,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 4, 2006, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A circuit court's grant of an extension of time to an inmate was remanded to the circuit court because the circuit court judge did not comply with Ark. R. App. P. Civ. 5(b)(1)(C) in that it did not find that all parties had had an opportunity to be heard on the motion.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
