 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Goins v. State, CR 02-972,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 24, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant's petition to correct sentence was filed more that seven years after the mandate affirming judgment in his case was issued, defendant's petition was untimely and had to be dismissed.
|
|||||
| Houston v. State, CR 02-1333,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 24, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Jackson v. State, CR 00-1383,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 24, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Jackson v. State, CR 02-104,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 24, 2003, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not improperly cross into jury's province when it directed them to deliberate further to fix incorrectly completed verdict form; hence, petitioner was not improperly denied postconviction relief from death penalty sentence.
|
|||||
| Vasquez v. Epley, CR 03-149,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 24, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Wright v. State, CR 03-121,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 24, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's motion to supplement the record was granted, but because the partial record was supplemented with the supplemental record, the petition for writ of certiorari was moot.
|
|||||
| Wright v. State, CACR 01-472,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 24, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant did not show that evidence in prosecutor's possession was not available to him at the time of his trial, defendant failed to demonstrate that he was entitled to writ of error coram nobis.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
