Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

   State Courts - Arkansas - April 24, 2003

  
Goins v. State, CR 02-972, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 24, 2003, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Where defendant's petition to correct sentence was filed more that seven years after the mandate affirming judgment in his case was issued, defendant's petition was untimely and had to be dismissed.

Search Cases for Free

  
Hamilton v. Jones, 02-749, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 24, 2003, Delivered
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
Houston v. State, CR 02-1333, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 24, 2003, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
Jackson v. State, CR 00-1383, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 24, 2003, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
Jackson v. State, CR 02-104, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 24, 2003, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court did not improperly cross into jury's province when it directed them to deliberate further to fix incorrectly completed verdict form; hence, petitioner was not improperly denied postconviction relief from death penalty sentence.

Search Cases for Free

  
Vasquez v. Epley, CR 03-149, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 24, 2003, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
Wright v. State, CR 03-121, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 24, 2003, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant's motion to supplement the record was granted, but because the partial record was supplemented with the supplemental record, the petition for writ of certiorari was moot.

Search Cases for Free

  
Wright v. State, CACR 01-472, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 24, 2003, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Where defendant did not show that evidence in prosecutor's possession was not available to him at the time of his trial, defendant failed to demonstrate that he was entitled to writ of error coram nobis.

Search Cases for Free

  
Back to Top