 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Lee v. Konkel-Swaim, CA 99-1191,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, May 9, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appeal from the trial court's initial order was dismissed as it was not a final appealable order. The notice of appeal was not amended to include the last order, disposing of the post-trial motions, nor was a new notice of appeal filed.
|
|||||
| McEntire v. Watkins, CA 00-1082,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, May 9, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court's finding for property owner was reversed as the occasional comments concerning the theory of acquiescence in the trial testimony did not establish implied consent to trial of the issue. The issue had not been pled.
|
|||||
| Palmer v. Palmer, CA 00-1212,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, May 9, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Chancellor erred in awarding prejudgment interest at 10 percent since the state constitution set it at 6 percent. Ousting brother failed to perfect his appeal questioning chancellor's authority to award attorney fees.
|
|||||
| Pollard v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., CA00-1158,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, May 9, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because all of the parties were not dismissed out of the appellants' lawsuit, order granting summary judgment to the appellees was not a final order from which the appellants could take an appeal.
|
|||||
| Shoney's, Inc. v. Porter, CA00-1106,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, May 9, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant employee presented substantial evidence, testimony, and medical opinion to support the Workers' Compensation Commission's decision to award workers' compensation benefits for appellant's injury.
|
|||||
| Spillers v. State, CACR 00-616,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, May 9, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: There was sufficient evidence to prove that defendant was in possession of a handgun. Defendant was the driver of a vehicle where a handgun was found on the driver's side floorboard, and he was nervous before his arrest.
|
|||||
| Ward v. State, CACR 00-1084,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, May 9, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence of, inter alia, controlled drug buy and cocaine in plain sight at defendant's home sufficiently showed that she knew of drug activities there and supported conviction of maintaining drug premises within 1,000 feet of a school.
|
|||||
| White v. Carco Carriage Corp., CA 00-1175,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, May 9, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: On review of a workers' compensation matter, the appellate court affirmed the decision finding that appellant suffered from carpal tunnel syndrome on his left hand.
|
|||||
| Williams v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs., CA00-940,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, May 9, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence of dependency of mother's other children was relevant to adjudication of son's dependency when the circumstances had not changed. Mother failed to preserve her constitutional challenges for appeal.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
