 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Pratt v. Carpenter, CA 01-1306,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, May 1, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Landowners failed to rebut evidence establishing that purchasers and predecessors in title had met requirements under law to vest title by adverse possession. Purchasers had purchased property for consideration and in good faith.
|
|||||
| Puckett v. Dir., Empl. Sec. Dep't, E01-275,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, May 1, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Board of review erred by denying employee unemployment benefits and finding she voluntarily left her employment as there was no substantial evidence to support the conclusion, or that she was discharged for work-related misconduct.
|
|||||
| Roberson v. State, CACR01-263,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, May 1, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant wilfully violated a condition of his suspended sentence, thus trial court did not err in revoking suspended sentences. Sentences were not revoked based on terms that were not written and of which defendant had no notice.
|
|||||
| Smith-Blair, Inc. v. Jones, CA 01-1068,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, May 1, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence was sufficient to sustain award of workers' compensation benefits to employee as commission could weigh all evidence and determine that employee's physician was most credible.
|
|||||
| Tim Parker Jeep Eagle v. Milam, CA01-955,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, May 1, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where employee suffered an L5-S1 disc herniation in 1996 and an L3-4 disc herniation in 1999, and physician testified injuries were related, no "major cause" requirement was required. Rather, a basic causation test was all that was required.
|
|||||
| Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Daniels, CA 01-1281,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, May 1, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Workers' compensation commission properly awarded employee additional medical treatment even where a majority of doctors found she had reached maximum medical improvement, where a contrary diagnosis was found more persuasive.
|
|||||
| Wilson v. Glenbrook Subdivision Prop. Owners' Ass'n, CA01-1254,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, May 1, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly granted property owners' association restraining order against homeowners from using common property where property had not been dedicated and no easement by necessity arose.
|
|||||
| Yellow Freight Sys. v. Parker, CA01-1211,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, May 1, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence of employee's physical condition and wage-loss factors were substantial evidence to support workers' compensation commission's finding of 40 percent wage-loss disability and that he cooperated with employer's job-placement assistance.
|
|||||
| Young v. Cross County Hosp., CA01-1208,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, May 1, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where claimant was infected with hepatitis C in 1975 while working for a hospital and suffered symptoms over the years, but was not actually diagnosed with the disease until 1998, her 1998 claim for benefits was barred by the statute of limitations.
|
|||||
| Young v. State, CA CR 01-1293,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, May 1, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence was sufficient to support conviction for possession of controlled substance with intent to deliver and possession of drugs and firearms, where defendant exercised care, control, and management over contraband and knew it was contraband.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
