 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Tarvin v. Dir. Empl. Sec. Dep't, E 02-259,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, April 30, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Worker who voluntarily quit his job as a truck driver after 3 months to help his wife care for her 15 and 5 year old grandchildren had not shown a personal emergency entitling the worker to unemployment compensation benefits.
|
|||||
| Tinkes v. State, CACR 02-476,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, April 30, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the evidence showed that defendant had almost all of the necessary ingredients to produce methamphetamine inside of a building, there was sufficient evidence of manufacturing, as evidence of the finished product was not required.
|
|||||
| Walker v. State, CACR02-1200,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, April 30, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Circumstantial evidence was sufficient to establish defendant's intent to deprive his former girlfriend of her purse and supported defendant's conviction for robbery and misdemeanor theft, where defendant struck the victim and took her purse.
|
|||||
| Young v. State, CACR02-934,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, April 30, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where attorney failed to file a brief after being given an additional 30 days for filing, court of appeals found attorney in willful contempt for failure to file the brief, and contempt order was forwarded to the committee on professional conduct.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
