 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Mutafis v. State, CR 04-245,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 29, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Parish v. State, CR 03-1358,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 29, 2004, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a sexual assault case, a court properly denied defendant's motion to sever offenses because both victims' testimony was admissible in the trial of the other to show defendant's intent, motive, common scheme, or plan.
|
|||||
| Standridge v. State, CR 03-558,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 29, 2004, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a sexual assault case, a court properly denied a motion to suppress a confession where defendant offered no evidence to establish a nexus between the conduct of the police and his statement.
|
|||||
| Tinkes v. State, CR 04-394,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 29, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court dismissed an inmate's petitions for writ of certiorari and mandamus, because the inmate had time to obtain a ruling on his motion to extend time to file the record and he failed to show that the trial court declined to act on the motion.
|
|||||
| Trotter v. State, CR 03-363,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 29, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly denied an inmate's postconviction relief petition; sufficiency-of-the-evidence issues and trial errors (some rising to the constitutional level) were not appropriate to raise for the first time in a postconviction petition.
|
|||||
| Volunteer Transp., Inc. v. House, 03-1010,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 29, 2004, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court had jurisdiction over Tennessee corporation, where it had substantial activities in Arkansas. Default judgment against corporation was proper, as it had proper time to respond to resident's complaint. Hearing on damages was necessary.
|
|||||
| Whitfield v. Maples, 04-300,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 29, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err in declining to issue writ of habeas corpus, because inmate's complaints concerning his arrest and search and seizure were not sufficient to show that commitment was facially invalid or that trial court lacked jurisdiction.
|
|||||
| Wilson v. State, CR 03-1316,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 29, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
