 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Engram v. State, CR 99-928,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 4, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Murder conviction and death sentence were affirmed. If insufficient alone, combined with testimony placing defendant at crime scene, DNA evidence proved identity. Capital-murder and first-degree murder statutes did not unconstitutionally overlap.
|
|||||
| Farmer v. State, CR 99-627,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 4, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Victim testified that attack was not sexual, but evidence was sufficient for rape conviction; there was forcible penetration and appellant threatened to hurt victim so that she would not be able to have sexual relations with another man.
|
|||||
| Foundation Telcoms., Inc. v. Moe Studio, Inc., 00-96,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 4, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Company did not preserve its objection to the authority of the special judge for appeal where it did not file the appropriate pleadings or give the regular judge the opportunity to review the proceedings that occurred before the case was called.
|
|||||
| Gregory v. State, CR99-820,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 4, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Circumstantial evidence was sufficient to compel reasonable minds to the conclusion that defendant murdered the victim and stole his car, and excluded every other reasonable hypothesis than that of defendant's guilt.
|
|||||
| Hill v. State, CR 99-959,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 4, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Despite fact that prior revocation was reversed on due process grounds, second revocation of appellant's probation was upheld on appeal, despite res judicata objections, because there was no judgment on the merits.
|
|||||
| Ibsen v. Plegge, CR 00-52,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 4, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Mann v. State, CR 00-31,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 4, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Nooner v. Langston, 00-249,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 4, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Osburn v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs., 99-1296,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 4, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
