 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Barker v. Rogers Group, Inc., CA 00-985,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, May 16, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Government contractor was entitled to summary judgment under acquired immunity doctrine, in personal injury action alleging type of asphalt contractor applied to highway, pursuant to government contract, caused traffic collision.
|
|||||
| Billings v. Plum Creek Lumber, CA 00-1251,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, May 16, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Workers' compensation claimant was only required to submit objective medical evidence to establish existence and extent of injury, but not to establish causal relationship between injury and work-related accident.
|
|||||
| Bunch v. State, CACR 00-1035,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, May 16, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant knowingly and intelligently waived Miranda rights when confessing to police; detective's response to defendant's inquiry about prosecution for other crimes did not induce defendant to confess; confession was not involuntary.
|
|||||
| Burrow v. State, CACR99-1195,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, May 16, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Substantial evidence supported verdict convicting defendant of negligent homicide and driving while intoxicated; evidentiary objections raised on defendant's behalf at trial were correctly overruled.
|
|||||
| Butler v. Dir. Empl. Sec. Dept., E99-327,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, May 16, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Unemployment insurance claimant was not eligible because she was paid salary for portion of time for which she sought benefits and made no effort to return to work for remainder of period.
|
|||||
| Chambers v. Chambers, CA00-874,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, May 16, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred harmlessly in admitting evidence of mother's pre-marital sexual relationships; custody award did not clearly err; mother's new trial motion was not supported and objections to private investigator's testimony were not preserved.
|
|||||
| Couch v. Dir. Empl. Sec. Dept't & Albemarle Corp., E 00-44,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, May 16, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Unemployment insurance claimant was ineligible for benefits because he was discharged from his employment for misconduct involving dishonesty for falsification of his employer's records.
|
|||||
| Dillard v. State, CACR 00-862,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, May 16, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Ellis v. Burlington Indus., CA 00-01087,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, May 16, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Permanent-disability benefits because of headaches were denied to a worker who received temporary total-disability benefits for a head injury because she failed to submit objective and measurable evidence to support her claim.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
