 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Rosamond v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs., CA01-942,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, May 8, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Termination of mother's parental rights was proper as child had been subjected to neglect or abuse that endangered her life; it was in child's best interest not be returned to mother's custody. Evidence was sufficient to support termination.
|
|||||
| Taylor v. State, CA CR 01-215,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, May 8, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where trial court made no inquiry as to whether defendant understood risk in representing himself and defendant rejected his public defender, record did not reflect that defendant knowingly and intelligently waived his right to counsel.
|
|||||
| Vergara-Soto v. State, CA CR 01-912,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, May 8, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant, who waited outside residence during police search that found methamphetamine and a gun, could not use statutory defense to simultaneous possession charge, as defense was limited to where defendant was present in residence.
|
|||||
| White v. Remington Arms Co., CA 01-1229,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, May 8, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Employee's first injury was not established by medical evidence supported by objective findings. Workers' Compensation Commission was within power to accept doctor's opinion that procedures should not have been performed and were not necessary.
|
|||||
| Wimberly v. State, CACR01-1235,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, May 8, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction of Class C felony theft by receiving was affirmed where he did not preserve his challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence of the value of the stolen truck to justify reducing his conviction to a misdemeanor.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
