 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Tubbs v. State, No. CR06-945,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 10, 2007, Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court did not err in denying defendant's motion for a directed verdict where there was sufficient evidence under the constructive-possession inquiry to link defendant to the contraband, crack cocaine, under the driver's seat and in the back seat of a vehicle; the vehicle was not only registered in defendant's name, but he also insured it.
|
|||||
| Wesley v. State, No. 07-375,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 10, 2007, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Inmate's motion for leave to file belated appeal of order denying his application for writ of habeas corpus was denied where he did not establish good cause for his failure to tender record in timely manner. The record tendered by inmate did not contain a motion to proceed in forma pauperis or any order pertaining to request to proceed as indigent.
|
|||||
| Yarbrough v. State, No. CR07-07,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 10, 2007, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Search was proper, under Ark. R. Crim. P. 3.1, because an officer determined that he was going to give defendant a warning for a traffic violation, he asked defendant for consent to search, and the passenger, whose name was on the car rental agreement, consented to the search; at that time, the officer had not returned defendant's paperwork.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
