 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Arnett v. State, CR 01-265,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 17, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Brady v. State, CR 01-393,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 17, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Pro se petitioner was convicted of DUI. Petitioner, who requested review and motion for rule on clerk, was entitled, under court rules, to a copy of a substituted brief filed by attorney.
|
|||||
| Branscum v. State, CR 00-782,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 17, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In appellant's capital murder trial, trial court did not err in refusing to grant a directed verdict as there was ample evidence to convict, appellant's statements were not involuntary, and photos of victim were admissible.
|
|||||
| City of Lowell v. City of Rogers, 00-991,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 17, 2001, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Genuine fact issues existed as to whether city had complied with statutory requirements to avoid annexation of its territory by another city, making summary judgment inappropriate.
|
|||||
| Dirickson v. State, CR 99-795,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 17, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Counsel was not ineffective for failing to request second mental evaluation where State provided one evaluation and appellant was merely attempting to shop around for doctor that would declare him incompetent.
|
|||||
| Forrest Constr., Inc. v. Milam, 00-830,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 17, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Neither restrictive covenants, development's marketing, nor its general plan of development prohibited developer from splitting lots; sewer easement across one lot was invalid as both spouses did not execute it.
|
|||||
| Hillard v. State, CR 94-238,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 17, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Supreme court had no ground to grant request by petitioner for copy of transcript for post-conviction relief who asserted that he could not go forward without a copy of the trial transcript lodged on appeal.
|
|||||
| In re Davis, 01-460,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 17, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Order disbarring attorney from practice of law made final order; however, petition to remove respondent's name from the list of attorneys permitted to practice law was abated pending notice to respondent.
|
|||||
| Jackson v. State, CR 00-1147,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 17, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court concluded after conducting a hearing that petitioner failed to advise his two appointed attorneys of his desire to file a belated appeal.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
