LexisNexis
  
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Arkansas - May 17, 2001

  
Jones v. State, CR 01-178, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 17, 2001, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Martin v. State, CR 99-828, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 17, 2001, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Supreme court declined to reach the merits of appeal in which appellant contended trial court erred in ruling petition was not timely filed. Timeliness could not be determined as appellant failed to abstract lower court's mandate.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Shook v. Huffman, 00-1131, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 17, 2001, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: Petition for writ of prohibition by wife in her capacity as shareholder to prevent sale of assets of corporation jointly held with husband pursuant to divorce decree was denied as wife failed to pursue available remedies such as appeal.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Skinner v. State, CR 00-1361, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 17, 2001, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Petitioner's motion for rule on clerk, seeking review of the trial court's decision to deny coram nobis petition could not be filed; supreme court had previously ruled that there was no such motion could be filed.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Standridge v. State, CR 01-101, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 17, 2001, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Petition for postconviction relief dismissed for want of jurisdiction where petition was not filed within 60 days of the date the mandate was issued upon affirmance of the judgment.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State v. Stapleton, 01-523, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 17, 2001, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Sutter v. Sutter, 00-552, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 17, 2001, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court did not err when it ruled inter vivos trust was valid. Decedent had executed a bill of sale and he gave, sold, and conveyed personalty to himself as trustee. Rule against perpetuities was not violated.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Washington v. State, CR 01-409, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 17, 2001, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Supreme court refused to consider petitioner's reasons for filing belated appeal of order denying his petition for postconviction relief when petition filed in the trial court was untimely.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Williams v. Norris, 00-37, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 17, 2001, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Doctrine of equitable estoppel did not preclude department of correction from recalculating appellant's parole-eligibility date to his detriment where initial eligibility date was erroneously calculated.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

 www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us
  Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.