 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Howard v. State, CR 00-803,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 9, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Prosecutor's statement in closing that the murder victim witnessed defendant strangling her child before she died was not improper; though there was no direct evidence of this, it was a plausible inference from the evidence.
|
|||||
| Koch v. State, CR 00-1189,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 9, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant failed to shoulder burden of proving ineffective assistance of counsel and to show that failure to call co-defendant was not choice of sound trial strategy or that it resulted in conflict of interest.
|
|||||
| Luebbers v. Advance Am. Cash Advance Ctrs. of Ark., Inc., 01-1182,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 9, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Until class action members' intervention issue was decided, they were not independent parties to class action, other than as class member objectors who had no right to independently appeal the class action settlement.
|
|||||
| McGhee v. State, CR 02-353,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 9, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant timely filed notice of appeal, but did not timely file record, motion for belated appeal or for rule on clerk was remanded to determine why record was not timely filed and why no motion for rule on clerk was pursued earlier.
|
|||||
| Miles v. State, CR 00-635,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 9, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant, who was convicted of robbery and kidnapping, did not have speedy trial right violated. Delay from State's motion to continue was properly excluded. Trial court did not abuse its discretion by refusing to allow witness's testimony.
|
|||||
| Moix-Mcnutt v. Brown, 01-283,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 9, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellate court refused to retreat from occurrence rule with respect to commencement of limitations period in legal malpractice cases, and affirmed that action began to run, in absence of concealment of the wrong, when the negligence occurred.
|
|||||
| Oakwood Homes Corp. v. Woodall, 02-349,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 9, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where questions as to whether or not potential class action lawsuit involved disparate classes and whether supersedeas bond was required pending interlocutory appeal were questions for trial court, motion for stay was remanded to trial court.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
