Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free! Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free! While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
	State Courts - Arkansas - May 8, 2003
	Holt Bonding Co. v. State, 02-290, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 8, 2003, Opinion Delivered View this case - free   Overview: Forfeiture entry against a bonding company was upheld, as a nunc pro tunc order, which correctly identified the bonding company named in the original order, was properly served, and the bonding company failed to show any prejudice resulted. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	In re Rules of the Supreme Court of Ark. & Court of Appeals of Ark., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL], SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 8, 2003, Opinion Delivered View this case - free   Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Koontz v. State, CR 99-791, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 8, 2003, Decided View this case - free   Overview: Where defendant failed to demonstrate a compelling need for a photocopy of the partial record at public expense, the supreme court denied the pro se motion. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	State v. Hardiman, CR 02-407, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 8, 2003, Opinion Delivered View this case - free   Overview: The trial court committed error when it suspended 7 years of defendant's 10-year sentence following her conviction for simultaneous possession of drugs and a firearm, as a suspended sentence for that crime was unavailable. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	State v. Pinell, CR 02-691, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 8, 2003, Opinion Delivered View this case - free   Overview: The trial court erred by sentencing defendant to a term of probation for the crime of rape, and the matter was reversed and remanded to the trial court with directions to sentence him in accordance with state sentencing statutes. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Tarry v. State, CR 01-1022, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 8, 2003, Opinion Delivered View this case - free   Overview: Supreme Court of Arkansas refused to reconsider ruling that defendant would not be allowed a late appeal of a criminal conviction unless counsel admitted fault. Application of court rules was the province of the court, not a federal magistrate. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Thornton v. State, CR 03-374, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 8, 2003, Opinion Delivered View this case - free   Overview: Where attorneys of record certified to the supreme court clerk, by affidavit, that the transcript prepared by unlicensed court reporter was true, accurate and complete, the supreme court accepted receipt of the trial court record. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Watson v. State, CR 02-909, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 8, 2003, Decided View this case - free   Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Back to Top
	www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us   Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.