 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Herriman v. Gordon, CA 00-1366,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, May 23, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appeal from order addressing request for retroactive modification of child support payable dismissed for want of jurisdiction because order was not final determination of all issues presented in trial court.
|
|||||
| Hodges v. State, CACR00-01078,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, May 23, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Officer had probable cause to detain appellant. Record contained no evidence suggesting that officer's primary purpose in detaining appellant was to seek revocation of his probation. Thus, motion to suppress was properly denied.
|
|||||
| Hudson v. State, CACR00-1013,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, May 23, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An officer had reasonable cause to believe that appellant had violated city ordinances and a state statute in the officer's presence. This provided a sufficient justification for appellant to be arrested and searched incident thereto.
|
|||||
| In re Passing of Epperson, [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, May 23, 2001, Memorial Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Jacks v. Jacks, CA00-930,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, May 23, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Separation agreement provision requiring husband to pay wife alimony to pursue education, as long as she was full-time student, was not ambiguous, and trial court's finding appellee complied with conditions to receive alimony did not clearly err.
|
|||||
| Neville v. Hall, CA 00-1095,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, May 23, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Clear and convincing evidence was shown that consent to adoption was not required of parent of child in the custody of another where parent had not seen the child for five years and failed to enforce his visitation rights.
|
|||||
| Pate v. State, CACR 00-735,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, May 23, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The statement of the affiant, a police officer, referencing "chemicals," coupled with his testimony that he meant only ether and starting fluid did not establish he made a false statement knowingly and intentionally; the warrant was valid.
|
|||||
| Rayburn v. State, No. CACR 00-1045,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, May 23, 2001, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Victim testified that she was under 14 when appellant induced her to perform oral sex upon him. Also, trial court did not abuse discretion by admitting rebuttal evidence. Thus, evidence was sufficient to convict him of rape.
|
|||||
| Strain v. Strain, CA 00-849,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, May 23, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Chancery court erred by retroactively imposing a modification of a support order beyond the filing date of a petition to modify in the absence of finding of fraud in procuring the existing support decree.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
