 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Reynolds v. Johnson Reg'l Med. Ctr., CA04-1244,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, May 18, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Arkansas Workers' Compensation Commission specifically credited third doctor's testimony that the surgery on employee's neck was for bone spurs. Record did not show that same was a causal result of her prior compensable injury where two other physicians had found no disc herniation or nerve-root impingement, but had noted degenerative-disc disease.
|
|||||
| Searcy v. Whitwell, CA04-533,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, May 18, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Issues raised in plaintiff's quiet title petition included invalidity of government's levy and sale of his property. Those issues were resolved against plaintiff in two earlier appeals. They were barred by res judicata and could not be used to support his action. The same was true with respect to the validity of title as to purchasers of property.
|
|||||
| Tilson v. Dir., Ark. Empl. Sec. Dep't., No. E 05-6,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, May 18, 2005, Opinion delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the appellate court was unable to reconcile the Arkansas Board of Review's findings of the claimant's expenditures with the facts in the record and where she had no savings, the board's decision to hold her liable to repay the overpaid unemployment benefits under Ark. Code Ann. § 11-10-532(b)(1) was not supported by substantial evidence.
|
|||||
| Travelers Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Titsworth, CA04-1119,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, May 18, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The contractor was entitled to credits from the insurer for equipment leases and independent contractors where the contractor supported his testimony with credible evidence and the insurer did not prove its damages as part of its breach-of-contract claim. The trial judge did err in computing damages, which had to be recalculated.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
