Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free! Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free! While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
	State Courts - Arkansas - May 12, 2004
	Wallace v. State, CACR03-713, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, May 12, 2004, Decided View this case - free   Overview: Inquiry into witness's plea bargain was properly precluded, as was cumulative evidence of route from murder scene to body's location, collateral evidence could not impeach witness, and non-disclosure of witness statement did not prejudice defendant. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Walter Gray & Assocs. v. Rankin Ins. Agency, Inc., CA03-865, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, May 12, 2004, Decided View this case - free   Overview: Insomuch as the unpaid premiums for which corporation was found liable undisputedly arose from provision of insurance coverage for its trucking business at request of an employee who was granted that authority, summary judgment for agency was proper. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Young v. Gastro-Intestinal Ctr., Inc., CA 03-575, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, May 12, 2004, Opinion delivered View this case - free   Overview: In a tort suit, where a patient was killed after he refused to follow a medical center's directives not to drive after being sedated for a colonoscopy, the issue of whether the medical center breached it's duty of care was one for the jury. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Back to Top
	www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us   Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.