 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bennett v. State, CR 00-1399,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 24, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A search warrant based solely on the smell of a legal substance gave officer no reasonable grounds to believe it was properly issued, so good-faith exception to exclusionary rule was inapplicable and evidence seized was inadmissible.
|
|||||
| Boatman v. State, 01-419,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 24, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's habeas corpus petition, alleging an excessive sentence and ineffective assistance of counsel, was properly denied, as these allegations did not challenge the court's jurisdiction or the validity of the commitment.
|
|||||
| Farver v. Davis, CR 01-113,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 24, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Gipson v. State, CR 00-1246,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 24, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Hunt v. Ark. Dep't of Fin. & Admin., 01-389,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 24, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Without a certified record of lower court proceedings, it could not be determined that Arkansas Supreme Court had jurisdiction to consider petitioner's motion for rule on clerk. Accordingly, motion to proceed in forma pauperis was denied.
|
|||||
| Jackson v. City of Blytheville Civ. Serv. Comm'n, 00-1409,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 24, 2001, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Fire chief who retired after participation in Fire Fighters' Deferred Retirement Option Plan (DROP), then was rehired, was properly terminated because DROP statute required participants to terminate employment at end of plan.
|
|||||
| Lacy v. State, CR 00-909,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 24, 2001, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Though defendant twice asked to speak with counsel, he later initiated further communications with the police, and therefore his Miranda rights were not violated and his confession was properly admitted into evidence.
|
|||||
| Raglin v. State, CR 97-402,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 24, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appointed appellate attorney seeking to withdraw from action for post conviction relief was ordered to fully brief and discuss a claim of prosecutorial misconduct not addressed in counsel's first "no merit" brief.
|
|||||
| Swanigan v. State, CR 99-1106,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 24, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's appeal from the denial of his postconviction relief petition, which alleged ineffective assistance of trial counsel, was dismissed because he failed to include an abstract of his trial to enable the court to review the issue.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
