 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Arnett v. State, CR 02-767,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 15, 2003, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where officer responded to disturbance with no knowledge defendant was being investigated for incest, officer's question to defendant of, "What's up?" was general term of salutation. Defendant's incriminating response was spontaneous statement.
|
|||||
| Billingsley v. State, CR 03-204,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 15, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant did not file his petition for postconviction relief until approximately four months after the mandate of the court of appeals was issued, the petition was untimely, defendant's motion to stay was moot, and the appeal was dismissed.
|
|||||
| Davis v. Williamson, 03-399,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 15, 2003, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where order on individual's motion to extend the time of filing the transcript was entered 91 days after the filing of the first notice of appeal, the order was untimely, and motion for belatedly lodging the record was denied.
|
|||||
| Drug Task Force v. Hoffman, 02-809,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 15, 2003, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Property remained in possession of drug task force without court order, as evidence in case that could not be filed, as State failed to file timely criminal charges or a timely forfeiture action. Defendant was entitled to recover his drug money.
|
|||||
| Elliott v. State, CR 03-142,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 15, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Rules Governing Admission to the Bar of Ark., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 15, 2003, Opinion delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Mathis v. State, CR 03-236,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 15, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant failed to perfect his appeal by lodging the record in a timely manner, and did not establish that there was good cause for his failure to do so, defendant's motion to proceed with his appeal was denied.
|
|||||
| Merez v. Squire Court Ltd. P'ship., 02-1046,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 15, 2003, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A circuit court did not have jurisdiction to determine if employees were able to file a negligence claim against a contractor, as the evidence was insufficient to show that the Arkansas Workers' Compensation Act did not apply as a matter of law.
|
|||||
| Nooner v. State, CR 94-358,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 15, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
