 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Owens v. State, CR 03-76 and CR 03-78,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 15, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant's separate appeals of the denial of his petitions for postconviction relief were dismissed; both petitions were untimely.
|
|||||
| Ray & Sons Masonry Contrs., Inc. v. United States Fid. & Guar. Co., 02-697,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 15, 2003, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the case involved an indemnity clause in a construction contract, rather than a claim for damages due to deficient construction, the statute of repose did not apply; the court found that the action was timely filed.
|
|||||
| Smith v. S. Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. Co., 02-787,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 15, 2003, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment was proper against a claim under an underinsured motorist policy providing coverage to members of insured's family living in the insured's household. Live-in girlfriend was not a person related by blood, adoption, or marriage.
|
|||||
| Wright v. State, CR 03-441,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 15, 2003, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant's attorney accepted responsibility for failing to timely file defendant's notice of appeal, the appellate court found that such an error was good cause to grant a motion for a belated appeal.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
