 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Roston v. State, CR 04-588,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 19, 2005, Opinion delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's confrontation clause argument as to the confidential informant was not preserved for appeal. Pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. ¿ 5-64-401(b)(1)(i), defendant had committed an offense punishable by incarceration, and was therefore subject to a revocation of his probation. Crime lab personnel testimony was not necessary to prove case.
|
|||||
| Scott v. State, No. CR 05-350,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 19, 2005, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Scott v. State, No. CR 05-477,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 19, 2005, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Stewart v. State, CR 05-18,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 19, 2005, Opinion delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: There was no proof of why defendant did not have a reasonable excuse for failure to appear, Ark. Code Ann. ¿ 4-54-120(a)(2), other than the case coordinator's testimony; more had to be offered in the way of documentary proof or a judge's order, written or verbal, to subject defendant to a felony conviction for failure to appear.
|
|||||
| Terry v. State, No. CR 04-97,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 19, 2005, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The denial of the inmate's petition for postconviction relief without an evidentiary hearing was appropriate pursuant to Ark. R. Crim. P. 37.1 and 37.3 where his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel was without merit because he failed to show prejudice under the second prong of the Strickland test.
|
|||||
| Troub v. Norris, No. 04-1293,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 19, 2005, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The inmate's motion to file a belated reply brief was properly dismissed because the supreme court found that he could not prevail on appeal.
|
|||||
| Villines v. Harris, 04-568,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 19, 2005, Opinion delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: County court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction over claims of violation of federal constitution (in case at bar, deprivation of constitutional rights), and its judgment in that regard was void, as was circuit court's judgment affirming same. As to final order requiring determination of damages, prior case law was overruled.
|
|||||
| Williams v. State, CR 04-964,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 19, 2005, Opinion delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In the absence of a record that complied with Ark. Sup. Ct. Admin. Order No. 4, the supreme court remanded defendant's appeal following his rape conviction to settle the record regarding which of the police officer's remarks were objected to by defendant and were subsequently reviewed by the jury and trial court.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
