 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Public Emple. Claims Div. v. Keys, No. CA06-382,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, May 23, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Arkansas Workers' Compensation Commission erred in awarding an employee a hand-controlled, wheelchair-accessible vehicle where employee's benefits were governed by the law in effect at the time of his injury, Ark. Stat. Ann. § 81-1311; statute allowed provision only of apparatus that was reasonably necessary for treatment of the compensable injury.
|
|||||
| Southeast Ark. Human Dev. Ctr. v. Courtney, No. CA06-1046,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, May 23, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An employee was entitled to further medical treatment in a workers' compensation action because there was substantial evidence that the employee's condition had not stabilized and she had not been as far restored as the permanent nature of her injury permitted. Thus, temporary-total-disability benefits should not have been stopped.
|
|||||
| Sunbelt Bus. Brokers of Ark., Inc. v. James, CA06-948,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, May 23, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An appeal from a business broker company and its agent of an order awarding damages to a buyer in her fraud action was remanded where the record was abbreviated, and it was not possible to determine whether all of the claims had been adjudicated. Other than the judgment and notice of appeal, none of the pleadings were in the addendum.
|
|||||
| Weaver v. Weaver, CA 06-1126,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, May 23, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Qualified domestic relations order (QRDO) divided husband's retirement account. Ambiguity created by parties' differing interpretation of property-settlement agreement was properly decided for wife because ambiguity was a fact question for trial court. Also, entry of QRDO was permitted, under Ark. R. Civ. P. 60, because of court's inherent powers.
|
|||||
| Williams v. Ark. HHS, No. CA06-1492,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, May 23, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The termination of parents' parental rights to their children was proper under Ark. Code Ann. § 9-27-341(b) because the trial court had before it clear and convincing evidence of the children's abuse. And, even though the trial court erred in denying the parents' request to proceed pro se, that error did not cause them to suffer prejudice.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
