 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Baldwin v. State, CA CR 00-970,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, May 30, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where appellant failed to follow the strict letter of the rule perfecting his appeal from the municipal court, by filing instead an appeal bond signed by the judge, appeal was dismissed. Substantial compliance was insufficient.
|
|||||
| Beasley v. Vanatta, CA00-1019,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, May 30, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Despite agreement between parties to convey property to corporation, title was never conveyed and it remained in the seller's name. There was no evidence of consent for property to be destroyed.
|
|||||
| Bland v. Arkansas Dep't of Human Servs., CA 00-1335,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, May 30, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Father's unstable job and housing situation, failure to make support payments, and ignoring of orders prohibiting mother's contact with children over three year period was clear and convincing evidence supporting termination of parental rights.
|
|||||
| Bolton v. State, CACR-00-881,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, May 30, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Facts supported jury conclusion that appellant manufactured methamphetamine and simultaneously possessed the drug and a firearm. Failure to grant mistrial after prosecutor made comments was not a manifest gross abuse.
|
|||||
| Carman v. Haworth, Inc., CA 00-1267,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, May 30, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Workers' compensation claim for gradual shoulder injury caused by alleged rapid repetitive motion properly denied where appellant failed to present medical evidence substantiating injury or relating it to on-the-job injury.
|
|||||
| Charton v. State, CACR 00-1229,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, May 30, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Conviction for marijuana possession with intent to deliver and enhancement sentence for intent to deliver within 1,000 feet of a publicly funded housing development affirmed where appellant failed to preserve error in trial court.
|
|||||
| Hass v. Hass, CA 00-1432,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, May 30, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred by modifying child custody in parental relocation case where it based decision on child's best interests without proper consideration of custodial parent's interests, and by failing to consider alternative visitation schedule.
|
|||||
| In re Lestina v. Lestina, CA00-993,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, May 30, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of adoption petition was not clearly erroneous where mother's consent was required under statute. Evidence that mother communicated and visited child, albeit sporadically, was sufficient to warrant consent requirement.
|
|||||
| Jackson v. State, CACR00-1121,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, May 30, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Victim suffered from cerebral palsy since infancy and could not flee or resist. Appellant threatened to harm her if she did not undress and submit to the rape and he struck her. Thus, evidence was sufficient to support rape conviction.
|
|||||
| Latta v. State, CACR 00-910,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, May 30, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Conviction for manufacturing methamphetamine upheld where trial court did not abuse discretion by denying motions for mistrial and refusing to charge jury on personal-use exemption, where facts did not necessitate its use.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
