 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| State v. Sullivan, CR 99-1140,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 16, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Arkansas Supreme Court relied upon state law and deviated from federal standards and upheld suppression of fruits of pretextual-arrest, finding that officer would not have effected arrest but for suspicion defendant was involved in narcotics.
|
|||||
| State v. Williams, CR 01-1195,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 16, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellate court refused to accept State's appeal because it did not involve the correct and uniform administration of the law, and only dealt with the application of the law.
|
|||||
| Strom v. State, CR 01-933,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 16, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial attorney had sufficiently consulted with defendant about her appeal. Given defendant's indication to plead guilty to other charges, and attorney's credible testimony that she never mentioned appeal, attorney acted reasonably.
|
|||||
| Troub v. State, CR 02-361,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 16, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly denied petition for writ of error coram nobis as defendant sought to raise issues that should have been raised in petition for postconviction relief. Defendant could not use coram nobis as a substitute.
|
|||||
| Wal-Mart Stores v. Lee, 01-403,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 16, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where employee only gave consent to search for limited items in his home, employer could be liable for intrusion when he contacted police to engage in full search of employee's home.
|
|||||
| White v. Perry, 01-861,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 16, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in not granting individual's motion for a nonsuit without prejudice and instead granting public entities' motion to dismiss, where individual's motion was clearly presented to the trial court prior to submission of the case.
|
|||||
| Williams v. City of Fayetteville, 01-211,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 16, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Bond issue on ballot measure to finance debt on construction of convention center did not create restraint on city spending, and use of city sales-tax revenue to pay portion of costs was not illegal exaction.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
