 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Stokes v. State, CACR04-1075,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, May 25, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the victim and her sister testified that defendant hit the victim outside of a convenience store, causing her a black eye and a cut to her hand, substantial evidence supported defendant's conviction for third-degree battery under Ark. Code Ann. ¿ 5-13-203(a)(1-3) (Repl. 1997).
|
|||||
| Swaim v. Wal-Mart Assocs., CA 04-1116,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, May 25, 2005, Opinion delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In workers' compensation matter, Workers' Compensation Commission erred in denying benefits because there was no evidence to support finding that an employee's broken foot was idiopathic and noncompensable under Ark. Code Ann. ¿ 11-9-102 (2002); evidence did not support conclusion that employee's diabetes made him predisposed to broken bones.
|
|||||
| Thomason v. State, CA CR 04-667,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISIONS FOUR AND ONE, May 25, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant was found in his home in possession of marijuana, but none of the four firearms on his property was loaded, he was not in possession of a firearm that was readily accessible for use; therefore his conviction for simultaneous possession of drugs and firearms was reversed.
|
|||||
| Walters v. U.S. Timber Co., CA 04-1326,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, May 25, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Arkansas Workers' Compensation Commission failed to make specific findings of fact, as required by Ark. Code Ann. ¿ 11-9-207(a)(5), in regard to the worker's physician's medical notes surrounding the worker's bilateral pronator-tunnel release surgeries; therefore, the case was reversed and remanded to the commission for specific findings of fact.
|
|||||
| Wilson v. State, CACR04-1288,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, May 25, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The record did not support a finding that the State's witness was an accomplice under Ark. Code Ann. ¿ 5-2-403 where there was no proof that he was charged or arrested on the theft-by-receiving charge and there was no proof that he encouraged defendant in committing the crime. Substantial evidence supported defendant's conviction.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
