 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Rhodes v. State, CACR04-807,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, May 31, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although a court erred by admitting hearsay at defendant's probation revocation proceeding because the State offered no explanation as to why the witness was unavailable, the error was harmless; the court's authority under Ark. Code Ann. § 5-34-309 to impose the maximum sentence was not conditioned on the nature of the subsequent violation.
|
|||||
| Sisk v. State, CACR06-8,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, May 31, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Sufficient evidence supported defendant's conviction for possession of pseudoephedrine with intent to manufacture, in violation of Ark. Code Ann. § 5-64-1102(a)(1) (1997), where defendant had purchased camp fuel and pseudoephedrine on the same day at different stores; the odor of a methamphetamine lab emanated from both defendant and his passenger.
|
|||||
| Stiggers v. State, CACR05-1399,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, May 31, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where victim testified that defendant was the perpetrator of a shooting, a neighbor testified that the victim and one other person were outside of a car when shots were fired, and evidence showed that a fatal shot to another victim was fired from the backseat of a car, convictions under Ark. Code Ann. §§ 5-10-102(a)(2), 5-13-201(a)(1) were upheld.
|
|||||
| Walton v. State, CACR03-395,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, May 31, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a drug case, the State was relieved from its obligation to produce a material witness during a motion to suppress evidence because defendant did not make any claims of coercion relating to a police statement until after the motion had been denied.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
