 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Ark. Transit Homes v. Aetna Life & Cas., 99-1123,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 18, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In suit brought by insurer against common carrier to recover insurance premiums owed to insurer, trial court was not clearly erroneous in finding that contract drivers retained by carrier were carrier's employees.
|
|||||
| Boston v. State, CR99-605, CR99-582, CR99-817, CR99-950, CR00-174, CR00-191,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 18, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Upon a motion for attorney's fees, state-salaried public defenders were deemed ineligible for additional compensation for work done on appeal.
|
|||||
| Casey v. State, CR00-388,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 18, 2000, Opinion delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Davis v. Office of Child Support Enforcement, 99-1422,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 18, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although a mother's supplemental security income benefits fell within the definition of income for child-support purposes, they were not subject to state court child support withholding.
|
|||||
| Gaines v. State, CR 99-1354,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 18, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where trial court dismissed appellant's complaint, alleging that people had given perjured, contradictory testimony, that was filed while his conviction was on appeal, appeal was dismissed because appellant could not have succeeded.
|
|||||
| Hussey v. State, CACR 99-61,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 18, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where petitioner offered no grounds for the request for a photocopy at public expense of the pro se brief he filed on appeal, he failed to demonstrate that he was entitled to receive a copy of the brief at public expense.
|
|||||
| In re D.J.L., No. 99-1134,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 18, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where appellants failed to abstract material parts of the record and failed to develop the legal issue raised, the abstract was flagrantly deficient and the judgment was affirmed.
|
|||||
| Maxey v. Tyson Foods, Inc., 99-637,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 18, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Workers' compensation tribunal erred when it held that 68-year-old, who had received on-the-job back injury and carpal tunnel injury, preventing her from manipulating objects, was not permanently and totally disabled.
|
|||||
| Murray v. State, CR 98-715,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 18, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because evidence supported rape and sexual abuse convictions, appellant signed jury waiver form, his motion for change of counsel was filed the day of trial, and his sentence fell within sentencing range, appeal had no merit.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
