Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

   State Courts - Arkansas - May 26, 2005

  
Aydelotte v. State, No. CR 04-822, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 26, 2005, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
Bradford v. Goodson, No. CR 05-165, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 26, 2005, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
Emery v. State, No. CR 04-1098, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 26, 2005, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: Inmate, who filed a pro se petition for habeas corpus pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. ? 16-112-201 (Supp. 2003), was not entitled to relief; the inmate's request for DNA testing failed since the technology was available and admissible at the time of trial.

Search Cases for Free

  
Herron v. State, CR 04-938, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 26, 2005, Opinion delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant's motion for severance where the additional defense that defendant claimed was being proposed by codefendant was not antagonistic to defendant's defense. Under Ark. R. Evid. 404(b), admission of defendant's prior battery conviction was proper given similar nature to crime charged.

Search Cases for Free

  
In re Marker, No. 05-549, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 26, 2005, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
Johnson v. State, CR 05-506, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 26, 2005, Opinion delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: The trial court did not err in denying an inmate's petition for postconviction relief under Ark. R. Crim. P. 37.1 because it was filed outside the time limits of Ark. R. Crim. P. 37.2, and the court dismissed the inmate's appeal; pursuant to Ark. R. App. P. Crim. 16, the court granted counsel's motion to be relieved as counsel.

Search Cases for Free

  
Lilley v. State, CR 04-1382, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 26, 2005, Opinion delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: An officer did not have reasonable suspicion, U.S. Const. amend. IV, to further detain defendant for a canine sniff after a traffic stop where the officer based the further detention on a one-way rental, a rental in another person's name, nervousness, and the presence of air freshener.

Search Cases for Free

  
Looney v. State, No. CR 04-578, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 26, 2005, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: Appellate court affirmed the denial of an inmate's petition for postconviction relief as the inmate was attempting to relitigate issues that had been presented on direct appeal, and hearing was not necessary as, under Ark. R. Crim. P. 37.3(a), the trial court made written findings and specified the parts of the record that supported its decision.

Search Cases for Free

  
McClellan v. State, No. CR 04-1318, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 26, 2005, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: Court denied defendant's motion for appointment of counsel in his appeal of denial of his Ark. R. Crim. P. 37.1 motion because postconviction matters were considered civil in nature; there was no right to counsel. Defendant made no statement as to merit of his appeal and failed to demonstrate that he was entitled to appointment of counsel by court.

Search Cases for Free

  
McCoy v. State, No. CR 04-505, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 26, 2005, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant's motion to file his reply brief belatedly was denied where defendant did not file a motion for extension of time explaining the reasons why his brief was filed late and defendant established no good cause for the belated filing.

Search Cases for Free

  
Back to Top