Arkansas, May, 2005, State Case law

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

State Courts - Arkansas - May 26, 2005

Parmley v. State, No. CACR 04-692, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 26, 2005, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free

Search Cases for Free

Pickens v. State, No. CR 03-695, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 26, 2005, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free

Search Cases for Free

Sanders v. State, No. CR 04-1331, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 26, 2005, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free

Search Cases for Free

Smith v. Maggio, No. CR 05-260, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 26, 2005, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free

Overview: In petitioner's action for a writ of mandamus on the ground that a trial judge failed to act in a timely manner on a series of motions to correct a mistake in judgment, a court requested a second amended response from the trial judge because although a hearing was scheduled, it appeared that at least one of petitioner's motions was still pending.

Search Cases for Free

State v. Fudge, No. CR04-83, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 26, 2005, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free

Search Cases for Free

Switzer v. Shelter Mut. Ins. Co., 04-80, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 26, 2005, Opinion delivered
View this case - free

Overview: Court properly directed a verdict for insurer on a bad faith claim where plaintiff submitted no evidence of any affirmative misconduct on the part of the insurer in handling a settlement; to the contrary, the insurer investigated the claim, reviewed accident reports, and determined that it was in the best interest of its insured to settle.

Search Cases for Free

Watts v. State, No. CR 05-149, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 26, 2005, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free

Overview: A court dismissed defendant's appeal of an order denying his Ark. R. Civ. P. 60 motion to vacate his conviction and sentence because it was evident that the motion was another attempt to circumvent Ark. R. Crim. P. 37.2(c). The Ark. R. Civ. P. 60 motion was another untimely plea for postconviction relief.

Search Cases for Free

West v. West, 04-393, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 26, 2005, Opinion delivered
View this case - free

Overview: Pursuant to Ark. R. App. P. Civ. 6(c), the mother was expected to include in her record all documents and information necessary for the appellate court to consider her arguments on appeal, which she failed to do; the appellate court could not review whether the circuit court had jurisdiction and ordered the mother to file a substituted brief.

Search Cases for Free

Communities Portal