 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Anderson v. Anderson, CA00-1125,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, June 6, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in granting mother's directed verdict motion upon father's motion for change of custody. Lack of proper dental care and mother's illicit sexual and promiscuous conduct was presumed detrimental to child.
|
|||||
| Armstrong v. State, CACR 00-1278,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, June 6, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant violated a condition of his suspended sentence. Violation was caused by his own conduct. Thus, trial court properly revoked his probation. Also, sentence was within the applicable statutory range and was affirmed.
|
|||||
| Avett v. State, CACR 00-911,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, June 6, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant's counsel learned of discovery violation when officer testified, but did not object at the first opportunity. Thus, counsel's argument was not preserved for appellate court's review and the conviction was affirmed.
|
|||||
| Berry v. State, CA CR 00-1004,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, June 6, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Driving while under the influence conviction affirmed; use of prior convictions that occurred before the sentencing enhancement statute was enacted to enhance the penalties did not violate the prohibition against ex post facto law.
|
|||||
| Box v. State, CA CR 00-802,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISIONS ONE AND TWO, June 6, 2001, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court violated defendant's right to a fair trial when it forced him to appear at trial in his prison uniform, and erred by admitting letter he allegedly wrote without properly laying foundation as to its authenticity.
|
|||||
| Coran Auto Sales v. Harris, CA 00-1058,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, June 6, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in substituting revocation of acceptance as an issue where buyer alleged fraud in the sale of a car, and awarding judgment thereon. Court could not base judgment in favor of a party on theory which they had not pled.
|
|||||
| Dillehay v. State, CA CR 00-1205,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, June 6, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of directed verdict on charges of aggravated assault and carrying a weapon proper where defendant pointed a gun at another person and officer found loaded, unlicensed gun in defendant's vehicle and in her possession with the safety off.
|
|||||
| Dinger v. Keith Watercare, Inc., CA 00-1024,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, June 6, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence that physical therapy was not helping injured worker and worker's healing period was over supported finding that worker did not prove entitlement to continued temporary total worker's compensation benefits or further medical treatments.
|
|||||
| Dodson v. State, CACR00-1160,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, June 6, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence was sufficient to convict defendant when defendant's own wife affirmed the fact that methamphetamine had been manufactured in defendant's trailer.
|
|||||
| Dubose v. City of Sherwood Police Dep't, CA00-1211,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, June 6, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Circuit court did not err upholding former police officer's termination due to theft charges, despite his subsequent acquittal. Lack of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt was not equivalent to preponderance of the evidence standard.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
