 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bush v. State, CR 01-1363,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 23, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Cloird v. State, CR 93-284,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 23, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant stated possible Brady violation, which warranted reinvesting jurisdiction in trial court to determine if DNA results were improperly held from defendant. Evidentiary hearing was necessary to determine in which county crime occurred.
|
|||||
| Dayberry v. State, CR 02-301,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 23, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Petitioner's motion seeking to proceed with a belated appeal was remanded to the trial court for findings on whether he waived his right to representation by counsel at the revocation hearing and for an appeal of the judgment.
|
|||||
| Eason v. Flannigan, 01-507,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 23, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Landholders sought to quiet title as against all the world and not merely the State; the U.S. should have been joined as a necessary party, and judgment was entered for one or more, but fewer than all the claims or parties.
|
|||||
| Farmer v. State, CR 01-1104,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 23, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err in denying defendant's motion for relief of an illegal sentence, where he was discharged from prison and was not in physical custody, so his claim was moot.
|
|||||
| Grady v. State, CR 01-1061,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 23, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Harasyn v. St. Paul Guardian Ins. Co., 01-1123,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 23, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where insured was injured when a car crashed into the wall of her business, the trial court properly granted summary judgment for the insurance company that denied UIM and PIP coverage based upon the policy's business premises exclusion.
|
|||||
| In re Dixon, No. 02-471,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 23, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Ragsdale v. State, CR 01-1399,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 23, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant failed to show that counsel's performance fell below objective standard of reasonableness and that errors had adverse effect on defense. Matters of trial tactics and strategy were not grounds for postconviction relief.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
